$ begingroup$ I've always found tuning PIDs to be very dependent on the characteristics of the system, which is why I've never found auto-tune systems to be terribly useful. They are fine for a first pass, low performance set of parameters, but they are far from optimal, and you will have the same problem with any general strategy which is not optimised for the mechanical, electrical.
- The controller would then perform corrections to the process until the desired performance was achieved. This would prevent oscillations that can be perceived by the user during auto-tuning. But if the inputs change drastically and the PID controller is no longer optimal, the auto-tuning can swap in new coefficients as they become available.
- Auto-tuning: the tuning is done by a software. I implemented Auto-tuning library for position and speed of DC motor (see the source code) using Relay On/Off method. This code is written for PHPoC platform. PID gain from auto-tuning is not the best gain. You can manually fine-tune based on PID gain from auto-tuning. Thing used in this project.
- Apr 01, 2014 Not happy with how your 3D printer keeps its temperatures? Fix it with Marlin's awesome PID autotune and improve the quality of your prints at the same time. Now where did i.
- Auto Tuning: (Standard with all Eurotherm PID Controllers) The standard initial method of tuning a process loop is to use the advanced adaptive tuning algorithms inbuilt in today’s controllers, to automatically test the loop and implement the optimum PID control parameters.
Pid Tuning Methods
The Ziegler–Nichols tuning method is a heuristic method of tuning a PID controller. It was developed by John G. Ziegler and Nathaniel B. Nichols. It is performed by setting the I (integral) and D (derivative) gains to zero. The 'P' (proportional) gain, is then increased (from zero) until it reaches the ultimate gain, which is the largest gain at which the output of the control loop has stable and consistent oscillations; higher gains than the ultimate gain have diverging oscillation. and the oscillation period are then used to set the P, I, and D gains depending on the type of controller used and behaviour desired:
Control Type | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | – | – | – | – | |
PI | – | – | |||
PD | – | – | |||
classic PID[2] | |||||
Pessen Integral Rule[2] | |||||
some overshoot[2] | |||||
no overshoot[2] |
The ultimate gain is defined as 1/M, where M = the amplitude ratio, and .
These 3 parameters are used to establish the correction from the error via the equation:
which has the following transfer function relationship between error and controller output:
Evaluation[edit]
The Ziegler–Nichols tuning (represented by the 'Classic PID' equations in the table above) creates a 'quarter wave decay'. This is an acceptable result for some purposes, but not optimal for all applications.
This tuning rule is meant to give PID loops best disturbance rejection.[2]
It yields an aggressive gain and overshoot[2] – some applications wish to instead minimize or eliminate overshoot, and for these this method is inappropriate. In this case, the equations from the row labelled 'no overshoot' can be used to compute appropriate controller gains.
References[edit]
- ^Ziegler, J.G & Nichols, N. B. (1942). 'Optimum settings for automatic controllers'(PDF). Transactions of the ASME. 64: 759–768.Cite journal requires
|journal=
(help) - ^ abcdefZiegler–Nichols Tuning Rules for PID, Microstar Laboratories
![Auto Auto](/uploads/1/2/6/2/126216104/110663463.jpg)
- Bequette, B. Wayne. Process Control: Modeling, Design, and Simulation. Prentice Hall PTR, 2010. [1]
- Co, Tomas; Michigan Technological University (February 13, 2004). 'Ziegler–Nichols Closed Loop Tuning'. Retrieved 2007-06-24.
External links[edit]
What Are Pid In Performance Auto Tuning Tool
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ziegler–Nichols_method&oldid=949638647'